Writing
Positions arrived at from inside the marketing seat at venture-backed companies, and what I concluded about the operating decisions that decide whether the work compounds.
Search is splitting in two. For twenty years the question was whether a page ranked. Increasingly it is whether a company gets named inside the answer a model generates, because a growing share of buyers never reach a results page at all.
Engineering assumes the thing you built will fail somewhere and treats finding out where as the work. Most marketing planning assumes the opposite, and describes only the version where everything goes right.
Strong marketing teams underperform all the time, and rarely for a lack of effort. The information they need already exists inside the company. Moving it by meeting is what costs the week.
Marketing is the only function where every person in the company arrives with an opinion on the plan. The fix is not a better argument. It is a set of operating decisions that can be made in an afternoon.
Most companies can name hundreds of keywords and cannot name the questions that decide whether a buyer understands the problem, trusts the solution, and knows what to do next.
AI can draft from almost nothing. Without current evidence, strategy, product truth, and recorded decisions, it produces plausible work for a company that does not exist.
Marketing and product argue about the same numbers because the funnel does not divide cleanly. It divides on control, not on stages, and that line can be drawn before anyone needs it.
Freeze the current answers, citations, competitors, source patterns, and referrals before making changes so later improvement can be compared with evidence.
A marketing engineer turns marketing judgment into reusable systems through data, context, workflows, agents, evaluations, measurement, and maintained infrastructure.
Before replacing a second or third marketing hire, it is worth establishing where the constraint actually sits. The funnel tells you where to look, and reading it correctly saves a year.
AEO software cannot create value from pages that answer engines cannot reliably access, understand, or attribute. Run the technical readability gate first.
AI raises the throughput of whatever the go-to-market system already believes, owns, and measures. Repair the commercial truth, evidence, decision rights, and data definitions before scaling it.
A competitor has a good week and the screenshot arrives by Monday. What happens next determines a surprising amount of whether marketing compounds or thrashes.
Most company content repeats information that already exists. Stronger sources contribute original evidence, first-hand experience, a defensible framework, or a clear method.
One founder decision can save millions or bankrupt the company: whether marketing helps build the growth strategy or is hired to rescue it later.
Automation does not clarify a marketing process. Define its inputs, decisions, owner, exceptions, and expected result before the system runs the work.
AI can produce more competent content than a marketing team can meaningfully evaluate. The advantage comes from knowing which ideas deserve the company's evidence, attention, and name.
Keep the established source when the buyer decision stays the same. Rebuild its answer before adding another generic page.
Goals get copied rather than derived, then measured as activity rather than result. Both mistakes are cheap to make and expensive to live with, and together they explain most of what looks like a talent problem.
Agents can divide research, planning, creation, review, and delivery. They cannot divide responsibility for whether the final result was worth producing.
The operating model should determine the technology. A tool selected first will quietly determine how the team works, what it measures, and which compromises become permanent.
Metadata can clarify a page. It cannot create the public evidence that makes a company claim believable, current, or safe to repeat.
Do not argue with the screenshot. Capture the inaccurate claim, trace the likely source path, repair the deepest wrong source, and test again after discovery catches up.
A useful comparison page helps a buyer choose between real alternatives. It states the advantage, publishes the tradeoff, and says when another option is the better fit.
Many new AI tools are just noise. I test them so you can use the best ones.
Occasional, no more than weekly. Unsubscribe any time.